As Organizational Leaders continue to assess how to best invest limited institutional resources, it is imperative that the University implement and promote faculty and staff compensation practices that effectively support our most important asset — our people. To assist our academic and administrative units with these decisions, the following Compensation Guidelines are provided for UAB Medicine and UAB academic/administrative units.
Compensation forms and templates previously located in this section can now be found in the Compensation Forms section in the Compensation Toolkit.
A large, complex organization such as UAB needs an efficient and effective communication channel that delivers timely information to those that need the information. Job roles help create focused communication channels for delivering information related to learning & development services, policy updates, cascading of organizational initiatives and more.
Click here to review job role criteria or download the UAB Job Roles Guide (PDF) for more information.
A Merit Matrix is a table created to help managers equitably allocate their merit pool dollars across their employee population. A merit matrix provides broad range merit increase bands that are based on the merit budget and employee job performance. It is a guide to help managers distribute the department’s merit pool equitably based on individual performance.
(based on a 3% Merit Budget Pool)
Overall Rank/Score |
Rank Definition |
Merit Increase Range |
1 | Does Not Meet Expectations | 0 |
2 | Meets Some but Not All Expectations | 0 |
3 | Meets Expectations | 1.0-2.5% |
4 | Meets All, Exceeds Some Expectations | 2.6-3.5% |
5 | Consistently Exceeds Expectations | 3.6-5% |
NOTE: Merit increases begin at an overall performance evaluation score of 3 or higher.
The UAB compensation and classification structure provides classification titles that are descriptive of the work performed, consistent within assigned job families, and titled within the character limitations of the HRIS operating system. However, when a more specific title would serve the unit’s operational interest, a working title or functional title may be used to describe the function of the position in even greater detail or in more easily recognized terms in both internal and external communications.
Working titles may be used in lieu of the University classification title for the following:
In determining the need for a working title, the supervisor and the employee should consider the following:
Supervisors should discuss their interest in a working title with their departmental leadership and unit Human Resources Representative. When an appropriate working title has been identified, the unit Human Resources Representative will initiate discussion with Senior Human Resources Leadership if deemed necessary. Consideration in working title reviews will include the guidelines established in this document as well as any additional organizational guidelines that may be established within a specific college or division, the consistency of titles within units or professions, and/or other relevant factors when approving requests for working titles. Senior Human Resources Leadership may also change or withdraw approval of a working title with notice provided to the individual(s) impacted.