Explore UAB

Title:

Health care providers’ roles and attitudes towards substance use disorder during pregnancy

Authors:

Margaret A. Williams, Suzanne Muir, Lauren Padalino, Brian M. Casey, William M. Perez, Sara Mazzoni, Lorie M. Harper

Background:

  • Patients with substance use disorder (SUD) are vulnerable to stigmatization in the healthcare system.
  • Stigma associated with SUD leads to delayed care and worse health outcomes.
  • SUD during pregnancy may be associated with increased social and legal penalties including felony charges and loss of custody.
  • Previous ACOG committee opinions have:
    • 1) cited the adverse health outcomes of policies used to criminalize SUD during pregnancy
    • 2) discouraged parent-child separation that is based solely on SUD
    • 3) addressed obstetrician-gynecologists’ responsibility to advocate for and refer patients to comprehensive substance misuse treatment programs

Specific Aims:

  • To examine hospital staff attitudes towards SUD during pregnancy.
  • To analyze differences in attitudes by staff members’ role. 

Methods:

  • The Collaborative Values Inventory from the National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare was distributed to inpatient and outpatient providers and staff at a tertiary care center for women and infants.
  • Self-reported interaction with pregnant, postpartum, or newborn patients was a criterion for participation.
  • The 57-item survey addressed drug testing, parenting, child removal/reunification, treatment/relapse, and SUD as a disease.
  • Staff were classified based on their self-reported area of work:
    • 1) MD/NP
    • 2) RN
    • 3) PCT/Other: patient care technicians, surgical technicians, ultrasound technicians, respiratory therapists
    • 4) Clerical staff
  • Groups were compared using chi square tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) as appropriate.

Results:

  • 942 staff received the Collaborative Values Inventory
  • 237 (25%) responded
  • Baseline Characteristics (Table 1)
    • The majority of respondents were female (92.8% of total), although males comprised 35% of MD/NPs.
    • The majority of respondents in the MD/NP and RN categories identified as white, whereas the majority of respondents in the PCT/Other and Clerical categories identified as black.
    • RNs reported more years of experience than MD/NPs and clerical staff. 

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics

 
 

Percentage (%)

 

MD/NP

RN

PCT/Other

Clerical

 

n=40

n=136

n=39

n=22

Age

       

    <25

0

13.2

15.4

4.6

    25 – 34

67.5

34.6

30.8

45.5

    35 – 44

10.0

21.3

25.6

22.7

    45 – 54

10.0

22.1

20.5

27.3

    55 – 64

5.0

7.4

7.7

0

    >65

5.0

0

0

0

Gender

       

    Female

65.0

98.5

100.0

95.5

    Male

35.0

0

0

4.6

    Other/Prefer not to say

0

1.5

0

0

Race

       

    Black

5.0

16.2

56.4

63.6

    White

87.5

80.2

41.0

31.8

    Other/Prefer not to say

7.5

3.7

2.6

4.6

Ethnicity

       

    Non-Hispanic

90.0

95.6

97.4

90.9

    Hispanic

7.5

2.2

2.6

9.1

    Prefer not to say

2.5

2.2

0

0

Average Years of Experience

 
 

8.4

12.4

11.0

5.6

  • Attitudes towards Drug Testing (Fig 1):
    • The majority of respondents, regardless of role, supported universal drug screening of pregnant women and infants.
    • MD/NPs were significantly less likely to support universal drug testing or to view drug screening results as the best indicator of recovery.

Figure 1
williams2 Fig 1

  • Perception of Competency
    • The minority of MD/NPs reported competency in working with or on behalf of substance using populations (38.5%) compared to the majority of respondents in the RN, PCT/Other, and Clerical categories (71.7%, 66.7%, 52.6%).
  • Parenting
    • The majority of respondents in the MD/NP, RN, and PCT/Other categories agreed that people with SUD can be effective parents, compared to a minority of clerical staff.
    • The majority of RN, PCT/Other, and Clerical staff agreed that babies who test positive for illegal drugs, or prescription medications not prescribed to their mother, should be removed from parental custody (86.7%, 91.4%, 95%), compared to a minority of MD/NPs (36.7%).
  • Attitudes towards SUD Treatment (Fig 2):
    • The majority of respondents agreed that SUD is a disease.
    • MD/NPs were more likely to support pharmacotherapy for SUD during pregnancy and to recognize that treatment beyond pharmacotherapy and withdrawal management is needed.
    • The majority of respondents in a non-MD/NP role reported that pharmacotherapy for SUD is substituting one drug for another.

Figure 2
williams2 Fig 2

Conclusions:

  • The majority of hospital staff recognized SUD as a disease.
  • Responses regarding treatment highlight discrepancies in perception of the need for pharmacotherapy and indications for drug screening.
  • Educational efforts should be targeted based on providers’ roles in an aim to improve uniformity around an evidence-based approach to SUD treatment during pregnancy and reduce stigma associated with SUD in pregnancy.