-
Step into the role of an NIH study section member and experience what happens after a grant is submitted. Through a facilitated simulation, participants will read, critique and score an actual grant (K or R application) and will see how their comments influence the discussion. Participants are able to learn how a study section operates from the other side of the process, to better prepare their own grants for review. Nothing can replace hands-on experience with grant reviews. Thus, participants will be required to read and score grants as if they were a reviewer.
Upcoming Sessions (all offerings will be held via Zoom):
August 13, 10-11:30 AM
Clinical Science R01, presented by William Geisler, MD, MPH
August 15: 9-10:30 AM
Clinical Science K, presented by Elizabeth (Lisa) Jackson, MD, MPH
August 20: 12-1:30 PM
Basic Science R01, presented by Martin Young, DPhil
August 22: 2-3:30 pm
Basic Science K, presented by David Pollock, PhD -
NIH Reviewer Orientation (pdf)
Review Criteria at a Glance – Master (pdf)
Scoring System and Procedure (pdf)
Guidelines for the Review of Human Subjects Section (pdf)
NIH Peer Review Webinars and Videos
Sample Applications and Summary Statements
Overall Impact vs. Significance (pdf)
Roles and Responsibilities of a CCTS Mock Study Section Member (docx)
-
Elizabeth Jackson, MD
Professor
Division of Cardiovascular Disease
University of Alabama at Birmingham
School of Medicine
Jackson is the Inaugural Bourge Endowed Professor in Cardiovascular Disease and has lectured extensively on women’s health and cardiovascular prevention. She is a reviewer for several cardiovascular and internal medicine journals and is on the editorial board for Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes and ACC.org. Her research interests are eHealth, cardiovascular prevention and behavioral interventions.
